4 ms·
I don’t think GPT is any better. I swear GPT-3 was the golden area of LLM prose. With a good fine tuning, you really couldn’t tell that an AI was writing (excep
by chamomeal 1mo ago
I don’t think GPT is any better. I swear GPT-3 was the golden area of LLM prose. With a good fine tuning, you really couldn’t tell that an AI was writing (except for when it would devolve into utter nonsense lol)
- adam_arthur 1mo agoCodex (5.6 Sol) is extremely to the point and direct in its responses. Often I'll tell it to summarize what it said only because it's providing too much detail, not that it's using esoteric language or weird claudisms. No idea why people are still using Claude models. My impression is they started on Claude Code and never tried Codex or other harness+model combos
- CodingJeebus 1mo agoI was on the Anthropic train for 2 years, and I tended not to jump between vendors much because it felt like a lot of distraction for little gain. But last week I switched to 5.6 Sol during an Anthropic outage and it made me realize how frustrated I was with Opus 5 and I haven't switched back.
- kif 1mo agoThat is true. On 5.6 I have noticed it to be a little bit more like Claude, which I dislike. But still way better than Claude.
- amunozo 1mo agoI've read many people saying that the huge GPT-4.5 has the best prose of LLMs, but never actually tried it.