3 ms·
I don't know. I fully agree, and never did really try out this in depth yet. I suspect rules with negations are not the same as don't rules, but unknown if rea
by yehoshuapw 1mo ago
I don't know. I fully agree, and never did really try out this in depth yet.
I suspect rules with negations are not the same as don't rules, but unknown if really true, if so:
"when writing code do not add comments, code should not need it" may work
- embedding-shape 1mo agoYour proposal is still a "Prohibition-type constraint" that the paper you linked earlier say "isn't good". Some of these constraints we want simply aren't possible without adding "do not" somewhere in the line, even if you prefix/suffix it with other stuff, as you noticed yourself :)
- wongarsu 1mo agoI don't think changing "don't" to "do not" is what the paper authors had in mind I use things like "Your code should be self-documenting, so as to require as few comments as possible. Add comments to explain "why" or give important context not apparent from the code itself, but keep them to necessary comments only" But that's a much laxer rule. I don't think you can truly express "no comments, ever" without a "don't" rule.