> You can't dismiss typography as irrelevant and trivial aesthetic. Sure I can. That's not to say that it's completely useless and not worthy of any attention

> You can't dismiss typography as irrelevant and trivial aesthetic. Sure I can. That's not to say that it's completely useless and not worthy of any attention at all, just that it is far removed from the primary considerations of software design -- it absolutely is an aesthetic matter that is not an important consideration until functional design is settled.