4 ms·
If the person was just rubber-stamping the computer decision, then likely yes it would still be against the law. They would likely need to demonstrate that each
by SoftTalker 2mo ago
If the person was just rubber-stamping the computer decision, then likely yes it would still be against the law. They would likely need to demonstrate that each case was evaluated and considered by a person with proper knowledge and/or training to make such a decision.
- formerly_proven 2mo agoIf rubber-stamping decisions by a supervising person is a breach of this GDPR rule, then the judiciary should be very thankful that the legislative excluded it from GDPR's scope :D
- SoftTalker 2mo agoLikely true, but I was speaking specifically about rubber-stamping an automated computer decision. The law seems to require human judgment to be applied, and just passing a computer decision unchallenged doesn't seem to do that. But I don't live in Europe, so maybe I'm giving it too much credit.