3 ms·
> something as simple as that Dutch Uber drivers aren’t employees [1]. [1] https://nltimes.nl/2026/01/27/uber-drivers-freelancers-employees-amsterdam-court-ap
by JumpCrisscross 2mo ago
> something as simple as that
Dutch Uber drivers aren’t employees [1].
[1] https://nltimes.nl/2026/01/27/uber-drivers-freelancers-employees-amsterdam-court-appeal-rules https://nltimes.nl/2026/01/27/uber-drivers-freelancers-emplo...
- molf 2mo agoThat's irrelevant. The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her. Nowhere in article 22 [1] does it restrict the scope to employees. If Uber processes data, and makes decisions based on that data in a purely automated way that significantly affects people, it is not allowed. That's all there is to it. [1]: https://gdpr-info.eu/art-22-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-22-gdpr/
- JumpCrisscross 2mo agoThis is a better citation than the original one.
- tecleandor 2mo ago> The case against Uber concerns European incidents from 2018 to 2022, stemming initially from a French complaint. It was handled by the Dutch regulator because Uber’s European headquarters are in the Netherlands.