> increase GDP of everyone has to hire a worker to fan them with palm leaves If that's how GDP worked, wouldn't it generally decrease with time as technology a

> increase GDP of everyone has to hire a worker to fan them with palm leaves If that's how GDP worked, wouldn't it generally decrease with time as technology automates tasks? What's funny about these future cost of climate change studies is even this incorrectly-pessimistic one just say that in 2100 we'll be about as rich as we would have been in 2090. 2090 level climate-change-free wealth sounds fantastic! That's not a disaster. There are doomers who're sure it'll be the end of civilization or otherwise a huge disaster but there are no quantified predictions showing that.