4 ms·
Not legally, which is the issue. I can "open source" Windows 11 and rip out some of the shittiness, but Microsoft is gonna take issue. If it were MIT licensed t
by fragmede 2mo ago
Not legally, which is the issue. I can "open source" Windows 11 and rip out some of the shittiness, but Microsoft is gonna take issue. If it were MIT licensed that would be a different story, but there isn't enough money for lawyers in the world where it's not.
- bpavuk 2mo agoI know enough people for whom this risk is the entire appeal
- kevin_thibedeau 2mo agoReverse engineering is legal in the US. You just can't disseminate the results if it runs afoul of copyright law or patents.
- bpavuk 2mo agowho said that you still technically cannot disseminate the results? bulletproof hosting and private communications still exist. if law is being used to harm the consumer, the consumer in question has full moral right to speak out against it, and taking ownership of your hardware (like OP tells they did) is one of the best ways
- davidron 2mo agoI believe you are responding to somebody commenting on the legal restrictions rather than the technical ones. It appears that you may have hallucinated the word "technical" in your response.
- fc417fc802 2mo agoSo what? Just be mindful of what you post on the clearnet. What you're doing is like worrying about the illegality of making sparkler bombs in your backyard IMO.