3 ms·
And yet this "next-token predictor" is able to churn out well tested, valuable solutions, to complex problems. If you want to downplay that as nothing more than
by infinite_spin 1mo ago
And yet this "next-token predictor" is able to churn out well tested, valuable solutions, to complex problems. If you want to downplay that as nothing more than a fancy auto-complete, be my guest, I lose nothing from that.
- nkrisc 1mo agoBut that’s a different bar. “Not intelligent” does not necessarily imply “not useful”.
- infinite_spin 1mo agoAs pointed out in a previous comment of mine, it meets the definition of "intelligent", my last response is regarding the claim that I've been "fooled". Are we going in circles now?
- chrisjj 1mo ago> And yet this "next-token predictor" is able to churn out well tested, valuable solutions, to complex problems. Same for countless computer programs from Excel to Google web search. Intelligence has nothing to do with it. Throw an unimaginable amount of computer power at a problem, and there will always be people who cannot imagine the results to be anything but the creations of intelligence.
- infinite_spin 1mo agoThat's like comparing a self driving car to a bicycle. One is clearly more intelligent than the other.