2 ms·
It sounds like you're talking about throughput aggregation, which indeed no device currently supports. Not even Apple's most recent devices have any sign of it,
by LoganDark 2mo ago
It sounds like you're talking about throughput aggregation, which indeed no device currently supports. Not even Apple's most recent devices have any sign of it, except that M5 Pro/Max MacBook Pro models are tested for simultaneous transmission on 2.4+5GHz and 2.4+6GHz: https://mrncciew.com/2026/03/17/macbook-pro-m5-wi-fi-7-missing-4096-qam-320-mhz/#comment-90720 https://mrncciew.com/2026/03/17/macbook-pro-m5-wi-fi-7-missi...
- gpt5 2mo agoUniFi UDB-Switch has throughput aggregation for 5GHz + 6GHz.
- gib444 2mo ago5GHz? Surely you mean 5000000kHz ;P
- SweetSoftPillow 2mo ago> which indeed no device currently supports Aren't devices with Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200/BE202 are supporting that? As well as latest Samsung phones?
- BlackRabbit1 2mo agoAFAIR: the BE200/B202 only have one radio. So no parallel streams on two frequencies. But they are the best cards around if you want to play with Wifi-7 on Linux. But always go for the latest wireless-next kernel + firmware blobs. Also they are not compatible with AMD mainboards (go for Qualcomm then).
- LoganDark 2mo agoBeing connected to multiple frequencies simultaneously is one thing. Actually using multiple of the links in parallel to increase speeds has not really been seen in practice yet. That is called STR (Simultaneous Transmit/Receive; what I called "throughput aggregation" above), which requires MLMR (Multi-Link Multi-Radio), which almost nothing that supports MLO has right now. Maybe some bleeding-edge mesh networks are doing it, and Ubiquiti has one or two products that does it, but you basically won't see it anywhere else and especially not in client devices yet. Intel BE200/BE202 does not actually perform throughput aggregation, it connects to multiple frequencies and then uses only the best of them (eMLSR, or "Enhanced Multi-Link Single Radio").