4 ms·
I have completely moved away from Claude to Codex. OpenAI models are better at following instructions and skill use. Claude generates more code, tries to build
by joddystreet 1mo ago
I have completely moved away from Claude to Codex. OpenAI models are better at following instructions and skill use.
Claude generates more code, tries to build things that are not planned or needed, repeats same mistakes over and over.
Chatgpt on the other hand just does enough, within a project would not repeat the same mistakes, tries to guess your workflow, so you don’t have to ask it to run the same.
If you need more control over your code/projects, if you know what you want to get done, use Codex.
If you have no idea what you’re doing and are happy to let LLM drive the thing, use Claude.
Codex/Chagpt is for the competent.
- mindwok 1mo agoI think the conclusion is a little too strong but mostly agree, Codex feels like a chisel and Claude feels like a wrecking ball.
- joddystreet 1mo agoYour words are definitely a better way to put it
- joddystreet 1mo agoOne more observation - Claude is better at delegation than Codex. Chatgpt is a better planner. Have a discussion in Chatgpt, have Claude to plan work chunks and have GLM to deliver, Codex to review and fix, delivers an overall a better version. Problem - It’s just too much of a context switching. Solution - I am thinking about a new product, a collaborative workspace where I can run this workflow.
- aabdi 1mo agolol i do this too, but i just use my own orchestrator. recommend building one yourself, think its better that way. there's quite a few on github,
- dbbk 1mo ago"tries to build things that are not planned or needed" I literally never experience this when using plan mode upfront