3 ms·
The main problem that age verification is solving is that we want children to be using child-locked devices, and those devices need to identify themselves. In t
by skybrian 2mo ago
The main problem that age verification is solving is that we want children to be using child-locked devices, and those devices need to identify themselves. In theory this could be solved simply by locked devices sending an HTTP header. Then it's up to parents (and the stores that sell devices) to make sure that children are using devices with a child lock turned on.
This technique allows the opposite: the id is used to validate a device as not child-locked. It's a whitelist instead of a blacklist. But maybe that's more practical in the short run?
Preventing unlocked devices from being used by children isn't a software issue. Someone could just give them the device. It's up to society to not do that. Determined teens will certainly circumvent it, but it doesn't have to work perfectly to change the culture.
- tomveber 2mo ago[dead]
- mikeysight 2mo agoThanks for the thoughts here! The whitelist vs blacklist association is spot on, and despite being practical I think there's an argument to be made that it's a strength, since it takes the onus off of the minor in this case and addresses the issue of unintentionally identifying underage users by forcing them to declare themselves. I also shared my thoughts about device-level enforcement in my reply to Scaled, would be curious to hear your take on some of those ideas there, if you get the chance. Really appreciate the feedback.