3 ms·
Since this is autogenerated, is it possible that it's going to be auto updated as new versions of python come out? That'd be pretty cool. It'd be interesting to
by a2ff6eeb0 2mo ago
Since this is autogenerated, is it possible that it's going to be auto updated as new versions of python come out? That'd be pretty cool. It'd be interesting to see this kind of thing unfold itself into a book.
When I feed it into an LLM, do you think it's going to improve the output of the code, or will it need additional prompting?
- gchamonlive 2mo agoCare to provide some examples? Would certainly add to the discussion
- a2ff6eeb0 2mo ago[flagged]
- gchamonlive 2mo agoAnswering a question with another question is rude
- a2ff6eeb0 2mo agoI don't understand the question. Examples of how to use the book to improve LLMs? Examples of how to auto update the book? That's what I was asking for. Are you asking how I know it was autogenerated? It says it right there in the repo.
- dijksterhuis 2mo agoIs it?
- gchamonlive 2mo agoYou say it like this, I'm not sure anymore
- saidinesh5 2mo agoThis is actually an interesting idea... Especially if it gives us an insight into what prompts were given to generate something we approve of vs. something we disapprove.
- thewhitetulip 2mo agoStreamlit library has a skill that directly reads from the DOCSTRING comments inside the Python library!
- skeledrew 2mo ago> this is autogenerated And then heavily edited by the author, over several iterations. There is no auto-update to create something similar.
- a2ff6eeb0 2mo agoThat's disappointing. We should be able to take the interpreter code, turn it into a book, and then make an LLM read it to improve the code people write.