4 ms·
What the hell? Responding carefully and specifically to a lawyer's question is not suspicious, it's standard operating practice whenever lawyers are involved. S
by cynicalkane 14y ago
What the hell? Responding carefully and specifically to a lawyer's question is not suspicious, it's standard operating practice whenever lawyers are involved. Systrom has no obligation to spill the beans about anything that some guy on the Internet thinks might be called an offer, and courtrooms have rules against assigning malicious interpretations thereunto.
- mburshteyn 14y agoNice thereunto.
- jonknee 14y agoSpilling the beans was exactly the point of his questioning.
- uptown 14y ago"carefully and specifically ... standard operating practice whenever lawyers are involved." You know - just like the terms and conditions.