3 ms·
This is like giving you three outputs from md5sum and asking you to guess for which one the input ended in a "q". There's no way to tell unless you break the RN
by lacker 1mo ago
This is like giving you three outputs from md5sum and asking you to guess for which one the input ended in a "q". There's no way to tell unless you break the RNG.
- pllbnk 1mo agoYeah, it's a pointless exercise. I hope the author is just trolling given that he is knowledgeable in the field. > Here are three 64-character hex strings. Two are random. One is HMAC-SHA256(secret_key, "anthropic"). You don't have the key. Which one is the HMAC?
- josh-sematic 1mo agoI think the point is probably to help convince people that the watermarking doesn’t perceptibly impact quality, which is a concern some people have (whether well founded or not).
- ipaddr 1mo ago"doesn’t perceptibly impact quality" no not perceptibly but it does.
- BoiledCabbage 1mo ago> no not perceptibly but it does. Similar to how a single particle of dust landing on your shoulder makes you weigh more. Yes it does - but anyone arguing that is completely missing the point.
- pllbnk 1mo agoEven then, LLMs are based on a lossy compression, so the quality is harmed by design.