> And he didn’t formulate the test with a 5 minute bound he just predicted that by the year 2000 that within 5 minutes an average interrogator would have a sub

> And he didn’t formulate the test with a 5 minute bound he just predicted that by the year 2000 that within 5 minutes an average interrogator would have a sub 70% chance of guessing correctly. Right, the test duration was left unspecified. This means any duration is acceptable. Including, for example, the only duration actually mentioned by Turing himself in his paper. Or do you have a more authoritative source on which durations are acceptable? > If one human on earth can consistently get it right then it hasn’t been passed Says who? Not Turing. Probably he didn't say that because it would make the test both impractical and overly conservative. > The fact these researchers have to keep adding bounds What "bounds"? The speed of the goalposts here is just amazing.