I don't want this to seem like a witch hunt, but I got an unpleasant surprise when I ran the text through Pangram... It got "100% AI" with "high" confidence, h

I don't want this to seem like a witch hunt, but I got an unpleasant surprise when I ran the text through Pangram... It got "100% AI" with "high" confidence, highlighting that it was likely "paraphrased or rewritten" [1]. I know Pangram gets a lot of flak, but so far I've found it to be pretty reliable, especially since they claim to have a very low false-positive rate. I then compared it with the original version of the article published on the author's GitHub [2], but got the same disappointing result [3]. And now I'm stuck. I don't know whether I should believe Pangram or the author of the article... [1] https://www.pangram.com/history/38ffe92b-0077-4bce-816a-b89be05ac2bc https://www.pangram.com/history/38ffe92b-0077-4bce-816a-b89b... [2] https://github.com/Suranjandas7/public_writing/commit/6b08add9cfc5c95079666166e3fabfefc42df302 https://github.com/Suranjandas7/public_writing/commit/6b08ad... [3] https://www.pangram.com/history/e9fea5bf-a2cd-4ba2-b6b0-75e0554e4229?ucc=mQ201OU6FYz https://www.pangram.com/history/e9fea5bf-a2cd-4ba2-b6b0-75e0...