4 ms·
>how is Grok not at the top of the list for deepfaking millions? How is this the top comment? I can go on just about any provider and make realistic "deep fake
by RetpolineDrama 2mo ago
>how is Grok not at the top of the list for deepfaking millions?
How is this the top comment? I can go on just about any provider and make realistic "deep fakes" of anyone.
Generating images isn't a crime?
- jnwatson 2mo agoIt absolutely is a crime in many jurisdictions.
- mbrumlow 2mo agoAre you sure? What if I painted the image , but happen to have a photo realistic capabilities ?
- whattheheckheck 2mo agoIgnorance of the crime isn't excused BTW. You do have a flake chatbot to ask the law about
- mbrumlow 2mo agoThe only people being ignorant at the ones saying deepfakes are illegal. It’s more complicated than what is being touted as fact. In most jurisdictions creation is legal, it’s publishing them that is not. In some jurisdictions threatening to publish them is also illegal. Most jurisdictions that have a creation policy apply to doing deepfakes they sexualize minors, which likely would have been illegal to possess under other laws. Then we have a consent issue. Creating and publishing them could be entirely legal if the subject consents to such. So yah. It’s not “deep fakes are illegal, let’s arrest everybody !!!” To be clear, creation is likely legal, publishing not so much. Additionally, intent is important with regard to AI hacking.
- nkrisc 2mo agoDepending on the output image and where you are, it definitely can be a crime.
- root_axis 2mo ago> I can go on just about any provider and make realistic "deep fakes" of anyone Not of CSAM - only Grok allows that.
- jedimastert 2mo ago> Generating images isn't a crime? Oh boy, have I got some bad news for you...