3 ms·
we need a way to access locally running web apps without doing an ugly http://localhost:8022 and having to remember that. I'd say http://localapps should give
by flossly 1mo ago
we need a way to access locally running web apps without doing an ugly http://localhost:8022 and having to remember that.
I'd say http://localapps should give an overview of all web apps running locally, with links to them. Those links should follow a naming scheme where the hostname ends with `.local` or smth.
So: http://claudecode.local http://claudecode.local
- antonvs 1mo ago> I'd say http://localapps should give an overview of all web apps running locally, with links to them. Malware will thank you.
- fc417fc802 1mo agoWon't that be cluttered by various random processes listening via 0/0? Perhaps we need a standardized service that web apps can register with.
- mr_olive 1mo agoHah, I was dealing with this problem today. My approach: Add entries for my localhost apps to `/etc/hosts`, and set up nginx as a reverse proxy. Now when I go to `http://myapp.local http://myapp.local` in the browser, `/etc/hosts` tells it to go to `localhost:80`. The http server sitting there knows which port to send the request to. I also made a systemd service that starts nginx automatically. Now I have meaningful URLs for local apps, and I don't have to remember which one is listening on which port.
- singpolyma3 1mo agoBring back installable PWA on desktop
- iskra 1mo agoRather than typing http://localhost:8022, name each app and put them behind one local proxy: 1. In /etc/hosts (or dnsmasq): 127.0.0.1 ourapp.test 2. Caddy in front: ourapp.test { reverse_proxy localhost:8022 } Caddy auto-provisions local certs, so you get https://ourapp.test https://ourapp.test, no ugly ports and no "not secure" prompt. For the overview idea: a tiny local dashboard that scans common dev ports (3000, 5173, 8080...) and lists each running app by name is a ~100-line utility. This is exactly the kind of small tool I build, happy to make a quick version for you.
- flossly 1mo agoCool! I'd say we need a big linux distro to buy into it, so that it provides it's config-panel and package manager UI in this format.