This is always the most silly argument. The original test was ambiguous but for sure the human was trying to prove themselves human. So the first thing they’d

This is always the most silly argument. The original test was ambiguous but for sure the human was trying to prove themselves human. So the first thing they’d do is tell me LLMs exist and the other thing is an LLM. Obviously a true human level ai could explain that away as a fabrication to trick me. I don’t think an LLM could do even this! Turings whole point was that through the medium of text along if the human and machine were indistinguishable then that was true intelligence. So yes conversations of arbitrary length are allowed (needed).