3 ms·
So it's a problem when a poverty striken nation expect aid to combat child mortality, but shelling out $150m on Juicero or $500m on Theranos is fine? Please try
by esalman 2mo ago
So it's a problem when a poverty striken nation expect aid to combat child mortality, but shelling out $150m on Juicero or $500m on Theranos is fine? Please try to answer without sounding like a psychopath.
- kev009 2mo agoWhatever point you are trying to make is not coming across, what even are these numbers and what do they have to do with citizenry of the United States? You also have a quantum view of the United States that it is and isn't impoverished, so it's supposed to liquidate to fund some other foreign entity that is not rate paying? I'm dizzy.
- esalman 2mo agoIt's probably not coming across because you're looking up too many synonyms.
- kev009 2mo ago"Looking up synonyms" huh? You have yet to make a coherent argument and keep trying to attack the messenger, typical behavior when people get called out for false entitlement. Your "psychopathy" accusations are pure cowardice.
- wonnage 2mo agoGo ahead and explain why you decided to use “quantum” and “liquidate” then bro
- kev009 2mo agoFluency in one's native language, what an achievement. Neither of these words are complicated. The treasury is unsalable bonds according to the thread, which means the US is in a financial collapse, but also has unlimited capacity to support someone's special interests abroad. Master logicians at work here.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- llbbdd 2mo agoAre you struggling to read their extremely simple English? Confusing remark.