I'm not talking about a decade from now and what could happen. We are talking about creating regulation today. Its absurd to believe we're currently at the le

I'm not talking about a decade from now and what could happen. We are talking about creating regulation today. Its absurd to believe we're currently at the level of dependency & intelligence that no other defense will be effective. Again, i'm much more worried about your perspective of the future has you believe its inevitable that we will build the level of dependency and hand over all control, that the only line of defense is the vague ethics framework we'd be installing right now. I'd go so far as saying that unlike these hypotheticals, we have historic examples of groups trying to stop conflict by converting/merging some religion or other cultural practices; and while it helps, the rate at which conflicts persists is unacceptably high if you believe failure is existential.