Points one and two are irrelevant to my comment, but that’s fine. I don’t expect any thoughts to be spent on whether not to deploy that stump speech. What does

Points one and two are irrelevant to my comment, but that’s fine. I don’t expect any thoughts to be spent on whether not to deploy that stump speech. What doesn’t make sense in points 3 and 4 are that the AI takeover is lead and powered by vile cretin scum who, in their former more honest days, were gleefully announcing the end of labor power. Being lead by them, how could it lead to “utopia”? Well, there are two possibilities that some AI evangelist might bring up. 1. It’s the volition of the AI that could lead to the “utopia”—they/it simply take charge after some threshold 2. No, it is still human-lead This point (1) conflicts with your own point (4) though; the all-powerful (or converging on at least) AI is foiled by human sins? How? The other point (2) conflicts with my point about how it is the vile cretins who are in charge of AI.