3 ms·
I mean, for 0.15-0.20% and a top end salary of $200k living in SF that sounds like a great opportunity!
by edot 1mo ago
I mean, for 0.15-0.20% and a top end salary of $200k living in SF that sounds like a great opportunity!
- kaikai 1mo agoDon’t get me wrong, $200k is a lot of money, but it’s not a top end tech salary in SF.
- steve_adams_86 1mo agoIt’s quite poor given that you don’t get to have a life outside of work, too. I’d start to think that sounds great if it was a 4 day work week, but 7… Bizarre.
- gedy 1mo agoAre you serious? That's not much to be able to live there. And for the top end no less?
- walrus01 1mo ago200k in SF with CA income taxes and SF cost of living is not that much at all. It's low enough that "No, you can't ever hope to afford to buy a home or get a mortgage in the city of your legal residence" is a flat out fact.
- duskwuff 1mo agoGood news / bad news: employees are also expected to "co-live in our Warsaw & SF Hacker Houses" (i.e. corporate frat house). Not quite sure how they get "teams of 20" living in those houses with a total company size of 15, though.
- walrus01 1mo agoMaybe they have some ex US Navy submariners that have introduced the concept of hot bunking.
- sheepscreek 1mo agoYeah, it's not much for SF.
- vunderba 1mo agoKills me when people don't internally adjust a stated annual salary against a workweek that is almost assuredly brutally higher than a standard 9-5. Between the "grinder mindset," the on-site traveling, etc. you're probably easily pushing 60 hours a week. A standard 200k full-time job clocks in at around $96 / hour. This job is more like $64 / hour.