4 ms·
I think if they are intelligent, intrinsically motivated, and willing to pursue knowledge beyond what the class requires, it probably helps. That last part is
by bcrosby95 1mo ago
I think if they are intelligent, intrinsically motivated, and willing to pursue knowledge beyond what the class requires, it probably helps.
That last part is key. Intrinsic motivation doesn't mean you pursue it outside normal bounds. My kid loves soccer, its her second favorite thing in the world, she has an absurdly high tolerance for physical discomfort while playing, but she doesn't play it at home. There's other things she's rather do, such as play with her toys.
When you move the bar to something even less interesting to most kids like science, you're going to have a pretty huge falloff. You're basically selecting for kids who choose to do it in their spare time. I know a lot of smart kids (I run a boyscout troop, my wife a girlscout troop, both with lots of high achievers), and none of them do this.
- bonoboTP 1mo agoI think a substantial minority of students like subjects beyond what the class requires. They go to extracurriculars to learn more interesting math and science, or are history buffs who read about it on their own time etc. These are the people who as adults move things forward and solve novel challenges so it is important to equip them well.