Rust does have the same Memory Ordering idea (minus the ill-fated "Consume" ordering) but provides richer tools for a modern world than C does. The C standard l

Rust does have the same Memory Ordering idea (minus the ill-fated "Consume" ordering) but provides richer tools for a modern world than C does. The C standard library provides nothing to actually do concurrency, such as making more threads, nor to synchronize them, such as with a mutex whereas of course Rust provides std::thread::spawn and std::sync::Mutex In C this is a platform specific problem, for Unix systems you want pthreads for example while Windows provides a different arrangement. Rust does not provide out-of-the-box structured concurrency - which I would like - but it's a lot closer to what I'd prefer here.