3 ms·
For those who had access, how does it compare IRL with GLM 5.3 ? iirc both models are similar in terms of benchmarks ?
by gorgmah 1mo ago
For those who had access, how does it compare IRL with GLM 5.3 ? iirc both models are similar in terms of benchmarks ?
- conception 1mo agoI’ve been working on a decompilation project that fable was choking on and GLM 5.3 has been chunking away at it for 72 hours now? I think it’s my favorite agentic/implementer model right now.
- ChickeNES 1mo agoOh? Can you share any details on the decompilation project?
- CamperBob2 1mo agoMy big fear is that they are busy nerfing the weights for "safety" before releasing them. In fact, they've more-or-less said as much. I have a feeling what we are about to see on HuggingFace is not the GLM 5.3 that you're using now.
- osti 1mo agoYou mean when they said they are doing safety evaluation and hardening? I'm having the same fear as you.
- CamperBob2 1mo agoYes, exactly.
- ganoushoreilly 1mo agoFrom a cost perspective Mythos is too expensive right now. With the right Harness and a few layers of models you can get close or better in some circumstances. Kimi / GLM, Qwen etc. And that's before ablation / Abliteration... For those in Mythos.. if you ask how much it cost to assess their repos, your jaw would drop. We're talking the price of buying a couple machines to run Kimi / GLM full weight outright.. for one Scan. Right now I wouldn't say GLM 5.3 is the same, but it's not far off. For the cost benefit it's the better of the two.
- teaearlgraycold 1mo agoThe GLM series is GOATed.