2 ms·

>Are you saying in the eventuality that... Legal cases are adjudicated by human judges who have been dealing with scenarios like this for thousands of years, s

by yodon 1mo ago

>Are you saying in the eventuality that... Legal cases are adjudicated by human judges who have been dealing with scenarios like this for thousands of years, since long before the invention of software and laptops, and who are not the least bit challenged when presented with strawman scenarios like the one you called out.

croon 1mo ago
You replied to this: >> Deleting your data is absolutely a crime when you know the authorities could've wanted whatever it was you deleted -- even if they haven't told you yet. > Can you provide a statute number for this crime please? Any federal or even state statute will do with this: > The google search required to find the answer ("federal statute for destruction of evidence") is shorter than your question here. > "Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry..."[0] The person you were replying to was asking for the basis of the crime where you haven't been informed police wanted your data. I pointed that out with a scenario. It's not a strawman.