Putting aside this specific case, I wonder how that $2,500 cost is calculated? Flock owns the devices and leases them out I think. Hypothetically somebody coul

Putting aside this specific case, I wonder how that $2,500 cost is calculated? Flock owns the devices and leases them out I think. Hypothetically somebody could take the device down and put it in a nice tidy little box for them. Then the cost to remedy is… how much they charge the town to send a person out to put it back up? Or how much it costs them internally to send somebody out to put it back up? If it is the latter, I guess it must just be somebody’s travel costs and wages (could be figured out like any contractor). If it is the former, does that have to be the same cost they always charge to send out maintenance people? (Since a disassembled, not destroyed camera should be one of the cheapest issues to deal with, right?). Otherwise it seems like they could exploit the law by specifically “charging” enough to make it a felony whenever they suspect tampering.