3 ms·
That's not a null hypothesis, that's a strawman. Regardless -- if we don't know jack shit about consciousness (your words), then any claims of LLMs being consc
by epihelix 2mo ago
That's not a null hypothesis, that's a strawman.
Regardless -- if we don't know jack shit about consciousness (your words), then any claims of LLMs being conscious are by definition untestable, pure speculation and based on no evidence at all.
- yreg 2mo ago> then any claims of LLMs being conscious are by definition untestable, pure speculation and based on no evidence at all. Am I saying otherwise? What's the correct null hypothesis according to you?