3 ms·

Able to vote for their leadership - check. Voice has a place - check. Incentives other than monetary - check. Chance to dictate more of their lives - check.

• shimman 2mo ago
  Sure, you're assuming that workers would want to form an HOA. I don't think this is true. Like other commentators, some guess that they would form representative republics. I also don't think this is true. What I do think is that by giving people the ability to shape their world, they may very likely shape it in ways that are beneficial to more than the few. How they do that is their prerogative, but surely you can see how this would be more beneficial than the oligarchies or dictatorships (the version of HOA you're thinking of, where the tyranical minority selected few harass the many) that form the vast majority of working corporations. We already know that centrally planned economies are extremely inefficient and some of the worst ways to foster collaboration, so why should we accept the same system in our working lives? I'm not saying I know how things will be better, but surely letting workers decide their fates is better than the current reality. You're acting as if workers don't know what's in their best interest to have sustainable careers. Give people a chance, they're way more imaginative than you think.