4 ms·
I also think Perl 6 has some really cool and innovative ideas. Far from using it to smear Perl, I think it is more interesting than previous versions. But you
by slurgfest 14y ago
I also think Perl 6 has some really cool and innovative ideas. Far from using it to smear Perl, I think it is more interesting than previous versions.
But you are in denial if you think that this chart isn't a reasonably representative cultural artifact of the Perl community and the Perl aesthetic. Perl 5 is not exactly poor in operators, and it is the same core community which produced both.
I don't think that Perl is bad. I am saying that Perl is very strongly what it is. And while some people won't like that aesthetic, I don't see why anyone should apologize for it.
- rjbond3rd 14y agoIs there really such a great difference between operators vs. class/method/function names? E.g., Math.pow() vs. ?
- mdellabitta 14y agoThere's a huge difference in searchability for one.