>I think we all know none of it is very secure software wise against a SOTA AI that can literally come up with its own zero day attacks. I mean this bits rich

>I think we all know none of it is very secure software wise against a SOTA AI that can literally come up with its own zero day attacks. I mean this bits rich too, it demonstrates a pretty poor understanding of modern security practices. Like having a single element of perimeter security is like 1990s security. We do defense in depth these days. Not to mention multiple overlapping controls for every element. It has been tested against AI bro security and found it wanting. Extrapolating that to the every system on the planet is nutso bananas. Actually if you think anything works this way just tell an AI model to go fetch you some money from the bank. Assuming it gets anywhere close to achieving its goal you can get an object lesson in modern SIEM processes when the feds explain the charges and evidence. Or maybe theres another reason my phone blows up when someone so much as edits a config file on a protected system.