3 ms·
> I have had excellent results from using AI, but it’s only because I understand what it is I’m asking it to look at, and know when it’s wrong. That knowledge
by p-e-w 2mo ago
> I have had excellent results from using AI, but it’s only because I understand what it is I’m asking it to look at, and know when it’s wrong.
That knowledge will be worthless 12-18 months from now when AI does everything better than you, including “understanding”.
If you’re one of the world’s best programmers, it might be 24 months instead, but the writing is on the wall for everyone.
I wonder if people were behaving like that for other revolutionary technologies in the past. “I can still run faster than a car can drive in sharp turns on a gravel road…”
- wasting_time 2mo agoIt will be interesting to see if LLM can push beyond the intelligence embedded in language. General intelligence may still be a ways off.
- nozzlegear 2mo agoGeneral intelligence is a convenient myth perpetuated by the marketing departments of AI corpos to help further their pursuit of regulatory capture. Don't fall for it.
- 27183 2mo ago> That knowledge will be worthless 12-18 months from now when AI does everything better than you, including “understanding”. ...what? Seriously though. What grand insight into the arc of AI development do you have? Where are you getting this from? Cite your sources. Show your analysis. Charitably, I would ask "are you high?".. If you're suffering acute psychosis from mind altering chemicals then we merely have to wait for the effects to wear off and you'll likely recover. If not, then I'm very sorry. Your road ahead is a rough one.