Each one reads to me as: User is lead to believe X, if they don't read the fineprint. X is not the case. Instead you get Y. That sounds perfectly fitting int

Each one reads to me as: User is lead to believe X, if they don't read the fineprint. X is not the case. Instead you get Y. That sounds perfectly fitting into a consumer rights wiki to me. Also, Clinton the cat is the much beloved cat of the persom who started the wiki.