2 ms·
If we really could develop in UML, that'd be a nice sweet spot. But everything I read about the rise and fall of UML is: it's great to start, but never keeps p
by cyanydeez 2mo ago
If we really could develop in UML, that'd be a nice sweet spot.
But everything I read about the rise and fall of UML is: it's great to start, but never keeps pace with day to day code changes and becomes almost useless out of the gate as real edges force different paradigms.
Now, if you could wake my AI up in the middle of the night and by morning my UML is is perfectly aligned, or the reverse, my UML realigns the code, that'd probably be a sweet deal.
but complexity is hidden in there either way.
- wccrawford 2mo agoThe AIs can read images and charts. If you want to try programming with UML, you should absolutely try it. My guess is that you'll initially be absolutely gobsmacked, but then the problems will start to show and it'll be frustrating as well.
- projektfu 2mo agoLet's be honest, programmers can't program from UML specs.
- wccrawford 2mo agoYeah. I think it'd be fun to watch an LLM try, though. I'm imagining that it'll really show all the things in the UML that don't fully make sense, but look great at first.