4 ms·
When a service that was already the primary git hosting provider for most of the world for 20 years grows at that rate its not mundane and its not comparable to
by tracerbulletx 1mo ago
When a service that was already the primary git hosting provider for most of the world for 20 years grows at that rate its not mundane and its not comparable to any example.
- mikert89 1mo agoAWS saw this growth every year for two decades, hyper growth tech sees it all the time
- jeremyjh 1mo agoThe absolute number doesn’t matter nearly as much as the change in rate of growth. The number of commits had not been doubling every six months at GitHub for a long time. At Amazon if traffic volume consistently doubled every six months that is actually quite a lot easier to plan for, it just becomes part of everything they do from very early on.
- mikert89 1mo agoim not buying that github is a unique engineering problem, harder than the rest of hyperscalars.
- jeremyjh 1mo agoNo one said it is unique. But if you take an infrastructure and engineering org that had been growing at 10% a year for a decade, you are going to have a different set of capabilities and practices in place. Adapting to a new reality of doubling every few months will predictably produce failures anywhere. GitHub is not unique in that regard.
- mikert89 1mo agoive spent 15 years in big tech companies, this problem is common and its why they pay engineers 500k-1M. this happens at meta literally all the time. half of engineering in big tech is just rewriting a system to scale microsoft is incompetent, they havent changed windows/excel/outlook in 30 years
- jeremyjh 1mo agoTell me about the time that an app at Meta grew at 10% a year for a decade and then began doubling every few months.
- mikert89 1mo agoits probably happened on half the core teams, idk what you want me to say, it sounds like you dont have alot of experience
- antiframe 1mo agoDon't dodge the question and attack the asker, that's rude.
- kaashif 1mo agoCan you give an example?
- jascha_eng 1mo agoInstagram, Facebook and even threads all had much more mundane growth rates and definitely no unexpected jumps like GitHub is experiencing. I'm sure if suddenly the solar system had 10 more earths with each about 10 billion people and they would all start using Instagram tomorrow we would have exactly the same growing pains and outages that GitHub has today. Luckily for Meta agents are not yet as much into doomscrolling as humans are.
- mikert89 1mo agoinstagram growth rate != core service team in instagram growth rate
- sgarland 1mo agoThey have what amounts to an unlimited budget for AI spend. If it’s so fantastic, why can’t they let it crawl over every piece of their codebase, every metric, every log, and spot these problems before they occur? “We misconfigured a sidecar” is something I would think AI could quite easily find and fix.
- jeremyjh 1mo agoI don't know who you are responding to. I haven't made any statements about what AI can do for them. I would expect AI is making the situation worse, like it is in many dysfunctional tech organizations.
- no-name-here 1mo ago> AWS saw this growth every year for two decades That does not seem to be true - which two-decade period are you talking about? AWS has only been around for ~20 years, and I just reviewed a 10 year period, and not a single one of those years saw doubling in the whole year, let alone doubling in a few months. Which 20 year period are you referring to, and are you referring to doubling every few months over that 20 year period?
- inigyou 1mo agoAWS saw doubling in usage every month for 240 months? So it now exceeds the number of atoms in the universe?