5 ms·

Impressive for whom? It's impressive for the service to have such growth at that scale, the code being slop is somewhat irrelevant. Your comment just seems like

Impressive for whom? It's impressive for the service to have such growth at that scale, the code being slop is somewhat irrelevant. Your comment just seems like mood affiliation (AI should be dismissed, growth was from AI, therefore growth should be dismissed).

Aachen 2mo ago
How is it impressive if we all know it's autogenerated? There's no more people there than there were before. Heck, at ~2x growth that's possibly a decrease in real humans there since bots generate loads of them per person
- airstrike 2mo ago
  It's an impressively large quantity of X, not an impressively good X.
  - Aachen 2mo ago
    That's not how I read the statement "It's impressive for the service to have such growth at that scale" that this was a reply to. They do seem to think the growth is impressive, not the absolute quantity, about which I agree with you
- gamegod 2mo ago
  Yeah, seems like AI slop is going to kill GitHub's free tier. I just don't see how the economics of having to host this much slop and provide service to slopcoders is going to convert into dollars for them otherwise. None of the humans involved are going to end up in big enterprises. It's all cost, with no pathway to revenue.
- seizethecheese 2mo ago
  > there's no more people there than there were before Seems false. Lots of coding adjacent people, engineering managers, etc. are now pushing PRs. > How is it impressive if we all know it's autogenerated? Nobody is saying the code is impressive, just the growth of github is impressive. It's not doing anythign different based on the source of the code.
shimman 2mo ago
Is it impressive? All it's doing is decaying the services. 15 years ago never have imagined I would go to the lengths to host a github alternative on a VPS but after doing just this (also being the last one in the my professional group to do so), GitHub is giving a master class in destroying their reputation in pursuit of advocating for hostile entities. Not all growth is good, especially growth that is actively hurting the company. There is an equilibrium in both nature and software. Purposely designing systems that mimic the effects of cancer is going to benefit who exactly?
- seizethecheese 2mo ago
  This growth is surely good for github. If another company becomes the "github for AI agents", they'll lose not just their business for AI but also human coders. (Sure, maybe there will be a human coder only github, but it will be quite small.)
  - shimman 2mo ago
    LLM companies are already wildly unprofitable. Who ever wants to do this can be my guest, but please let's tax them enough so that we can get something positive out of the stupidity like free public school lunches for children or universal childcare.

Aachen 2mo ago

How is it impressive if we all know it's autogenerated? There's no more people there than there were before. Heck, at ~2x growth that's possibly a decrease in real humans there since bots generate loads of them per person

airstrike 2mo ago
It's an impressively large quantity of X, not an impressively good X.
- Aachen 2mo ago
  That's not how I read the statement "It's impressive for the service to have such growth at that scale" that this was a reply to. They do seem to think the growth is impressive, not the absolute quantity, about which I agree with you
gamegod 2mo ago
Yeah, seems like AI slop is going to kill GitHub's free tier. I just don't see how the economics of having to host this much slop and provide service to slopcoders is going to convert into dollars for them otherwise. None of the humans involved are going to end up in big enterprises. It's all cost, with no pathway to revenue.
seizethecheese 2mo ago
> there's no more people there than there were before Seems false. Lots of coding adjacent people, engineering managers, etc. are now pushing PRs. > How is it impressive if we all know it's autogenerated? Nobody is saying the code is impressive, just the growth of github is impressive. It's not doing anythign different based on the source of the code.

shimman 2mo ago

Is it impressive? All it's doing is decaying the services. 15 years ago never have imagined I would go to the lengths to host a github alternative on a VPS but after doing just this (also being the last one in the my professional group to do so), GitHub is giving a master class in destroying their reputation in pursuit of advocating for hostile entities. Not all growth is good, especially growth that is actively hurting the company. There is an equilibrium in both nature and software. Purposely designing systems that mimic the effects of cancer is going to benefit who exactly?

seizethecheese 2mo ago
This growth is surely good for github. If another company becomes the "github for AI agents", they'll lose not just their business for AI but also human coders. (Sure, maybe there will be a human coder only github, but it will be quite small.)
- shimman 2mo ago
  LLM companies are already wildly unprofitable. Who ever wants to do this can be my guest, but please let's tax them enough so that we can get something positive out of the stupidity like free public school lunches for children or universal childcare.