45 ms·
That's why I said intent rather than letter. That said if we allow for arbitrary lengths of time, one could argue that sending back a reply indicating that the
by bulder 2mo ago
That's why I said intent rather than letter. That said if we allow for arbitrary lengths of time, one could argue that sending back a reply indicating that the source will be delivered in 50-75 years is equally compliant.
- westurner 1mo agoBut such would not be a reasonable amount of time or in the spirit of the agreed-upon policy.