2 ms·
JS has been in front-line for these functionalty, and HTML has been dog-slow to catch up with slow standardization (not based on usage more academical) and reco
by yipinwong 2mo ago
JS has been in front-line for these functionalty, and HTML has been dog-slow to catch up with slow standardization (not based on usage more academical) and recommendations.
HTML can do that. yes. but adoption? welp, I don't really care nor will I use it unless I have to. I will use whatever was available in practice and continue to use them.
- afavour 2mo agoOdd to both complain about adoption and out yourself as someone unwilling to move to a better solution because it’s less familiar. What do you expect the answer to be here?
- bigbuppo 2mo agoI suspect he's still optimizing for IE5 compatibility.
- yipinwong 2mo agoA snarky comment that does not contribute jack. Be gone, trollbot, if you ain't have anything better to say
- yipinwong 2mo ago"Better" is a subjective term, and you have no way of proving that it is better using any metrics. "Better" in my case is being able to move fast by implementing quickly, test fast, and move on with my tasks. HTML might be "better" in terms of standards, but if nobody follows it, what good is it?
- afavour 2mo agoI think you can measure “better” if you’re specific. I’m saying better for user experience. You are fine foregoing that if your development experience is better.