4 ms·

Why not object capability languages: https://blog.plan99.net/why-not-capability-languages-a8e6cbdf9682 https://blog.plan99.net/why-not-capability-languages-a8e6

• burnt-resistor 2mo ago
  No. Object-oriented brings things many languages cannot use. Also, that was a tl;dr fluff blog with barely any examples.
  • mike_hearn 2mo ago
    All languages in mainstream use are imperative and at least somewhat object oriented, other than SQL. But many of those don't have what it takes to implement capabilities (too flexible/dynamic).
    • burnt-resistor 2mo ago
      No, this is false and you're using weasel words and creating a strawman. I said add functions or capabilities to make it happen. You don't read.