4 ms·
It still works exceptionally well in 2026 and generally creates better and faster experiences than an SPA with far, far less code.
by wild_egg 1mo ago
It still works exceptionally well in 2026 and generally creates better and faster experiences than an SPA with far, far less code.
- culi 1mo agoI hate what it does to my back button
- hnal943 1mo agoHTMX is the solution
- zarzavat 1mo agoSo instead of using JS to sort the table directly, now you make a JS fetch() request to sort the table?! It does make sense in one situation, if the table is a large server-side paginated one and the sorting is really an ORDER BY clause. But for a basic table that fits entirely on the client, it doesn't make sense at all. There are tiny JS libraries that will make <table>s sortable when you add a particular class name.
- everybodyknows 1mo ago> tiny JS libraries that will make <table>s sortable What are some good ones?
- nozzlegear 1mo agoTrading one javascript for another?
- account42 1mo agoNo to sorting tables where all the data is already available locally.
- hk__2 1mo agoYou don’t need an SPA for that; Wikipedia has client-side sorted tables for example.