3 ms·

its literally not. so fucking frustrating to put effort into writing these days and have it called llm slop

• groby_b 1mo ago
  If your writing gets called "slop", you might want to look at why. It's usually and indication it's considered low quality writing, and... you can fix that. (Unless you use AI, then you're doomed ;)
  • tacoooooooo 1mo ago
    Calling my writing slop is one thing. Attributing it all to AI is another. Half my posts pre-date chatgpt. i've been writing like shit forever--its very human of me actually
  • Arainach 1mo ago
    On the contrary, I find that higher quality writing - the kind by authors who know how and when to use the emdash and semicolon, for instance - gets flagged as "slop" more. the only reliable way to not get flagged is 2 type like ur 12 and just discovered twitter and don't have a shift key and use run ons a lot which is doubleplusungood writing.
• dgellow 1mo ago
  Have you tried to not add AI generated image across your articles? That would definitely help reduce the AI slop feeling
  • tacoooooooo 1mo ago
    fair i guess. images are basically required if you want people to read your posts, and im not an artist, but fair i guess calling my whole site AI slop is a bit rude but mostly just wrong. I have put in a lot of work to my posts and my projects. and, > "I don’t think the author could explain what the second part of the article is supposed to mean" ??? its a bit. half the post is a bit. im leaning into it. _The weights were revealed inside a harness_ is literally glowing. wdym i cant explain any of it
• cindyllm 1mo ago
  [dead]
• dwaltrip 1mo ago
  Did you not use Claude to help write it? It's not standard slop, that is clear. But I saw a bunch of smoking-gun-claudisms in the post. Overall I did like it, I will say :)