Nice pov. I spoke mostly from an engineering perspective. When revisiting my corp career in executive position I agree! However when writing strategy documents

Nice pov. I spoke mostly from an engineering perspective. When revisiting my corp career in executive position I agree! However when writing strategy documents and stuff like that I think that the AI is mostly corrupting the idea and making it extremely verbose. If someone manages to make the AI speak straight to the point with the vision based on what they want to communicate, that, to me is completely fine too. What is kind of sad is that in the old times we would value a lot the folk that went and wrote a memo, put a lot of thought to it and so on.. Now literally you just plug claude in your notion and you have the document. To me, this kind of speaks about "the value was never really in the document itself"and more in the understanding of the doc. You can delegate a lot of stuff to the AI but you can't delegate understanding. So when you're presenting it to the exec committee, or circulating it, does not matter what claude/gemini/gpt wrote down, it matters if you understood it, agrees with it and understand that this represents your positioning. What I see w a lot of juniors, on the other hand, is that people really just copy and paste or shallow understand what was wrote. Delegating too much like that removes the human-seed and makes it kind of worthless