TFA states “the less tau and pi, the better” and calls the radian-oriented functions “legacy”. I understand that a title like “Turns are Better than Radians” is

TFA states “the less tau and pi, the better” and calls the radian-oriented functions “legacy”. I understand that a title like “Turns are Better than Radians” is intentionally inflammatory to get clicks, but I’d expect a more calibrated take in the article body. Phrasing like the above indicates the author doesn’t know what they’re talking about, even though I do agree turn-oriented functions would be useful.