I love both Forth and Lisp but SectorLisp it's far better. Also, for a small demo, check Eforth under Subleq/Muxleq: https://github.com/howerj/subleq https://

I love both Forth and Lisp but SectorLisp it's far better. Also, for a small demo, check Eforth under Subleq/Muxleq: https://github.com/howerj/subleq https://github.com/howerj/subleq edit subleq.fth/muxleq.fth and set these options to 1: 1 constant opt.multi ( Add in large "pause" primitive ) 1 constant opt.editor ( Add in Text Editor ) 1 constant opt.info ( Add info printing function ) 0 constant opt.generate-c ( Generate C code ) 1 constant opt.better-see ( Replace 'see' with better version ) 1 constant opt.control ( Add in more control structures ) 0 constant opt.allocate ( Add in "allocate"/"free" ) 1 constant opt.float ( Add in floating point code ) 0 constant opt.glossary ( Add in "glossary" word ) 1 constant opt.optimize ( Enable extra optimization ) 1 constant opt.divmod ( Use "opDivMod" primitive ) 0 constant opt.self ( self-interpreter [NOT WORKING] ) Then run this to create a new EForth image with float/do...loop and such: ./muxleq ./muxleq.dec < muxleq.fth > new.dec Subleq is the original one, muxleq it's multiplexed. The command it's the same, just replace muxleq with subleq (edit the fth file too). Usage: ./muxleq new.dec For a brief help: words On Forth syntax, the EForth Overview PDF will be enough, except for 8086 related code, where here it's different.