3 ms·
I've never seen a false positive from Pangram for human-written text of 300+ words.
by Nition 1mo ago
I've never seen a false positive from Pangram for human-written text of 300+ words.
- sam_lowry_ 1mo agoPangram sucks by seeding fear.
- zbentley 1mo agoSay more? I’ve found it quite useful and not a source of fear. It’s effective at calling out disrespect (human to human communication where one party stops participating as a human), and has been effective for me in writing my own communications more crisply and carefully
- sam_lowry_ 1mo agoFear of being tagged as AI even if you write the text yourself. For me personally, it's fear to use – and —. I have my versions of XKB keyboard layouts that handily map these but I don't use them anymore. Nor do I use emoji, because some 18-6 months ago AU output abused emoji.
- zbentley 1mo agoI honestly don’t think those are going to get you flagged as mostly-AI or with high confidence. On anything longer than a sentence I’ve found the false positive rate to be perfectly reasonable.
- rob 1mo agoSeems like you have now? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49372618 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49372618
- no_multitudes 1mo agoPeople sometimes tell lies on the internet. This is definitely AI-generated.
- RugnirViking 1mo agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49377954 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49377954