2 ms·
"Typst instead of LaTeX" Is this really an alternative? I would never replace battle proved TeX with consistent syntax, build for processing text, with great f
by piokoch 2mo ago
"Typst instead of LaTeX"
Is this really an alternative? I would never replace battle proved TeX with consistent syntax, build for processing text, with great fonts, thousands of plugins for some Markdown mess, which is, in addition, paid.
Only because it is written in Rust, not in C.
- mr_mitm 2mo agoYes it is, for many use cases. I'd argue the syntax is much simpler, more modern, and perhaps even more consistent (the fact that in TeX you can change the meaning of the escape symbol or the comment symbol is pure insanity IMHO). It can use any font, and the feature you know from LaTeX, a compiler, is free. Only the web application has some premium features. It's more like Overleaf. It's also several orders of magnitudes faster and has actually helpful error messages. The fact that it was written in Rust is less than secondary. Also, TeX was written in WEB, not C.
- poulpy123 2mo agoI don't think the main scientific journals accept it, so for that it is not a replacement. However, I would say that for most usages it's a good alternative even if it doesn't have all the ecosystem of 50 years of tex/latex
- yencabulator 1mo agoTypst is neither markdown nor proprietary, and can use any font you have installed. https://github.com/typst/typst/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/typst/typst/blob/main/LICENSE