3 ms·
That's besides point, the point is that classical software bugs are contained and we have process and understanding allowing us to discover them, triqge and fix
by febusravenga 1mo ago
That's besides point, the point is that classical software bugs are contained and we have process and understanding allowing us to discover them, triqge and fix. For AI based sw you can guess and try another prompt.
- kristiandupont 1mo agoWhy is that "the point"? You are the second person in this thread to insist on owning it. I get why it's problematic, obviously, but if it produces statistically better results (which I have no idea of), I don't think it's right to just write it off because of this.
- WelkinFolk 1mo agoBecause you cannot hold people accountable, since it isn't "people". We humans are emotional creatures, and we will always prefer systems where someone can be held accountable for mistakes. The developer, the doctor. Whoever. I do not oppose AI integration; I'm not a Luddite. But having a "move fast, who cares if a couple die" isn't the way to go with sensitive fields, like the medical field. I suppose we will come up with proper responsibility-hierarchies and guardrails around AI, but until then, people have a right to complain about the lack of them.