>Yes, and they usually want to form a state based around this identity. I suppose you don't consider that desire legitimate. But then who will perform the funct

>Yes, and they usually want to form a state based around this identity. I suppose you don't consider that desire legitimate. But then who will perform the functions of the state that you baselessly claim the internet solves? Who will settle disputes, determine land ownership, pass and enforce laws, prevent other groups from taking the territory, etc.? The internet? Genuinely dont care, but forming a bigger meaner government seems to be absent from most cultural priorities. >It's telling that you think that because they don't only do good, then the good that they do doesn't count. They're not innocent enough for you, so they should dissolve their militaries, surrender their ability of self-defense, and throw themselves at the mercy of the world (How does that usually work out?) I wonder if you apply this standard evenly, or only to things you dislike. I genuinely have no idea what you are driving at here.