4 ms·
> I don't find anything hard to defend about my argument. Of course. Because "I need more than 8 GB of RAM" and "the government should subsidize Microsoft" ar
by pfdietz 2mo ago
> I don't find anything hard to defend about my argument.
Of course. Because "I need more than 8 GB of RAM" and "the government should subsidize Microsoft" are logically equivalent statements. If you're insane.
- carlosjobim 2mo agoYou have provoked yourself into a rage, because you didn't understand the arguments being made here. Whether you have the capacity to understand, I don't know. But I'll assume so, and explain: 1. Nobody has argued either for or against for the government to subsidize Microsoft. 2. However people are arguing that the government should subsidize RAM makers. And their extended argument for it is that people choose to purchase Microsoft Windows. A well known low quality product. That's a very weak argument. If you choose to make bad decisions and use sub-par solutions when good solutions are readily available, that isn't something that the government should take to account when deciding on subsidies.